8.15 Functional training myth vs. reality
The phrase “Functional Training” started gaining popularity around the early 1990s, primarily in the rehabilitation and sports conditioning fields. The concept focused on exercises and movements to improve daily life and athletic performance. However, as the concept evolved, so did the interpretations of what functional training truly is.
Unfortunately, the term “functional training” has become somewhat of a buzzword in the fitness industry. It’s not uncommon for marketers and equipment manufacturers to capitalize on its appeal by promoting their products as essential for functional fitness. Unfortunately, this commercialization has led to misconceptions and myths surrounding the subject.
One common myth is that functional training must involve unconventional exercises, often with specialized equipment. While some functional training exercises might involve new or unique movements, the primary focus should be improving one’s abilities in daily tasks or performance in specific activities. It is essential to remember that the effectiveness of a functional training program is determined by its relevance to an individual’s goals and needs, not the uniqueness of the exercises.
Another myth is that traditional resistance training is not functional. This belief is misguided, as traditional resistance training will significantly contribute to functional fitness by helping to develop strength, endurance, and increasing muscle mass, all essential components of physical fitness. Furthermore, with its wide variety of exercises, traditional resistance training can be tailored to meet specific functional goals by adjusting them to meet our client’s current physical abilities and existing skill set.
For example, bodybuilding has often been criticized as non-functional. At the same time, CrossFit is frequently touted as the epitome of functional training. However, it’s important to recognize that functionality is not a black-and-white concept; instead, it’s a spectrum that depends on an individual’s specific goals and needs.
When we say that bodybuilding is functional, we mean that its primary focus on increasing muscle mass, symmetry, and aesthetics serves a purpose and can improve performance for those who seek such outcomes. For example, bodybuilders require strength, balance, and muscle control to achieve their desired physiques, all of which can be considered functional in the context of their goals.
Similarly, cardio-respiratory endurance training can be deemed functional for an endurance athlete, such as a long-distance runner, but less functional for a strength athlete whose primary objective is to build muscle mass and power. Ultimately, the functionality of a training program must be assessed in relation to the individual’s end goal.
With this in mind, we encourage you to think of functional training as a multidimensional concept open to one’s perception and adaptable to individual needs. As a personal trainer, staying up-to-date on the latest research and trends in the fitness industry and maintaining an open-minded approach to training methodologies is crucial.
We urge you to explore various fields of interest within the fitness realm to find your own path to success. By understanding the diverse nature of functional training and tailoring your programs to suit each client’s goals, you can provide them with the most effective and personalized training experience.
At the PT Business Academy (PTBA), the key to effective functional training lies in understanding the individual’s goals and needs. A successful functional training program should enhance a person’s daily life or performance in a specific activity, whether carrying groceries, participating in sports, or maintaining independence in older age. By focusing on individual goals and incorporating exercises that target those objectives, functional training can be an invaluable tool for personal trainers and clients alike.