Height and weight measurements are fundamental components of fitness assessments, providing baseline data to monitor progress and inform training programs. It is crucial to follow standardized procedures and best practices to ensure accuracy and consistency in these measurements.
A high BMI is related to the risk of type 2 diabetes and hypertension.
Sanada 2012
BMI is frequently discussed in the medical field, and general physicians may sometimes use it for classification purposes. However, it is essential to understand that BMI is not particularly useful for individual classification. Since the equation does not consider individual factors such as Lean Body Mass (LBM), it cannot be used to determine potential health risks accurately. For instance, an individual with a higher body weight due to a high LBM might be classified as obese even though their body fat percentage could be well under 12%.
These measurements help personal trainers evaluate a client’s body composition and track their progress over time. Moreover, they can be instrumental in identifying potential health risks related to excess body fat.
How to Perform Body Circumference Measurements: To ensure accurate and consistent measurements, follow these guidelines:
Here are some common circumference measurement sites and their respective standardized values for males and females:
Circumference measurements can be useful predictors of health problems, such as waist circumference correlating with heart disease risk. In addition, seeing changes in body dimensions can motivate clients with different goals, whether it’s losing fat or gaining muscle. However, some clients may feel self-conscious or demotivated if their progress could be more significant.
Personal trainers should use specific anatomical landmarks and follow established guidelines to ensure accurate measurements. Measurements should be made with a non-elastic, flexible tape that fits snugly against the skin without pressing into the subcutaneous layers. In addition, clients should wear thin, form-fitting clothing that allows for precise measurements. If they agree and feel comfortable, measurements should be taken without clothes covering the body landmarks.
Personal trainers should initially measure each site only once and then take duplicate measurements. If the recorded values differ by more than 5 mm, remeasure after waiting 20-30 seconds. Many of these assessments can be used alongside body-composition assessments, following the same protocols. Trainers should explain each procedure, ensure the client’s comfort, and use precise landmarks. After recording the values, trainers should discuss any health and fitness concerns related to abnormal readings and educate clients on strategies to reduce personal risk and improve overall health.
Consistency in location and technique is crucial for tracking progress. Key measurements include abdominal, hip, waist, biceps, and midthigh circumference, each taken with the client standing in specific positions. Following these guidelines will enable trainers to accurately monitor clients’ progress and adjust their training programs appropriately.
The Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR) is an important measurement when assessing health risks associated with excess body fat. Research suggests that the distribution of fat deposits might be a better indicator of disease risk than overall body fat (Jensen et al., 2013). WHR helps differentiate between android (apple-shaped) and gynoid (pear-shaped) individuals. Apple-shaped individuals carry excess fat in the abdominal area, while pear-shaped individuals have excess fat in the hips and thighs.
Although any excess fat weight is detrimental to health, android individuals with a high WHR face greater health risks. To calculate a client’s WHR, divide the waist measurement by the hip measurement. The resulting ratio helps determine the relative risk ratings for health issues associated with body fat distribution. By understanding and monitoring WHR, personal trainers can better tailor exercise programs to address clients’ specific health risks and improve overall well-being.
Body composition analysis determines the relative percentages of body weight from fat and fat-free body tissue or Lean Body Mass (LBM). These measurements are much more important to an individual’s overall health than simply body weight. Body weight, without any knowledge of an individual’s body composition, cannot indicate relative health risk or even the level of obesity. It is the excess body fat that leads to obesity and the risk of heart disease. Excess body fat on the upper body around the waist area is essential. Body fat around the waist has been shown to have the highest correlation with an increased risk of heart disease.
There are many methods for body composition measurements, some more accurate than others, but all of them have in common that they are so-called indirect measurement methods. For example, we cannot directly measure body fat or Lean Body Mass; every measure we make will therefore be an estimate of different components that make up our body. Hydrostatic weighing, also known as underwater weighing or hydro densitometry, is one of the most accurate ways to measure body fat but still relies on methodological calculation models to estimate body composition. It was considered the gold standard for measuring body composition until more advanced methods, such as CT scans and MRI scans, were developed (Yetman, 2020).
We will face several issues in personal training while attempting to measure body composition as accurately as possible. The main issue is access to more accurate methods such as CT, MRI, or even DEXA scans. Next to the issue of availability, there is the downside of high cost with the so-called “gold standards” of body composition analysis. Therefore many personal trainers will choose less accurate methods that are just reliable enough. Skinfold testing might be one option, but it requires a lot of practice, and as the PTBA suggests, tools that are less common than plastic calipers are often used in gyms.
In our opinion, there are two more critical aspects of skinfold testing you must be aware of as a personal trainer:
1) It is one of the most invasive measurements
2) It will be largely inaccurate with higher body fat percentages
We’re not saying you shouldn’t be using caliper testing at all, but you should be cautious with which type of clients that method is more suitable.
Regardless of which method you choose, we suggest you use the Body Composition measurements to follow the trend of changes occurring in the body while improving nutrition and mastering all components of fitness. We will explain more about the different methods you can use to choose the most suitable one for your clients.
Commonly called caliper testing, skinfold measurements were especially popularized through the teachings of the Strength and Conditioning legend Charles Poliquin. Poliquin was ahead of the industry in many respects and provided valuable views on training and nutrition interventions. Not all of them were science-based, and some turned out to be hugely controversial. At the same time, his positive influence on the strength and conditioning world as the fitness world, is undeniable.
When searching for the most precise technique of skinfold measurements, we suggest looking out for ISAK-accredited courses on anthropometry. However, the technique we provide in this book is considered a more basic approach that might be useful to personal trainers in everyday circumstances.
This technique involves using special calipers to pinch various body parts to measure subcutaneous fat found just beneath the skin. The principle behind skinfold testing is based on the established relationship between subcutaneous fat and total body fat (Heyward, 1991). By measuring the thickness of fat under the skin, it is possible to estimate the overall body fat percentage. Skinfold measurements can yield reasonably accurate results when performed correctly. When executed accurately, they can correlate well with body fat percentage measurements obtained through hydrostatic weighing—within about 3-5%. However, such accuracy can be achieved by following strict testing protocols and constant practice. We would estimate that a higher accuracy rate is achieved beyond 5.000 measurements performed and testing with calipers constantly.
However, skinfold testing has several limitations. For instance, this method does not measure visceral fat, the fat surrounding internal organs. Additionally, the accuracy of skinfold testing can be affected by variations in how individuals perform the pinching technique. Therefore, to minimize this error, it is advisable to have the same person consistently perform the test (Cannon, 2011).
There is a potential risk of obtaining inaccurate, misleading, and unreliable results from caliper measurements. If errors occur in the equations used, the measurements are taken poorly, or the consistency of the measurements is impaired, the outcome can lead to disappointment, frustration, and demotivation for both personal trainers and their clients (PTdirect, 2023). Therefore, again, we highly recommend an ISAK-accredited course for anthropometry to learn the precise protocols for skinfold testing.
There are various methods for caliper testing. Therefore, the number of sites commonly used for skinfold measurements in determining body composition will also vary. As we mentioned, different tools are also available to take the measurements. In our opinion and through years of practice, we found the most accurate measurement tool is the Harpenden Skinfold Caliper. Therefore, we encourage you to use the Harpenden caliper. For general practice, we will show four sites used in the Durnin and Womersley test (1974) for simplification purposes.
Procedures
• Take all skinfolds on the right side of the body (for reliability).
• The pinch should include two thicknesses, one of skin and one of the subcutaneous fat, but no muscle or fascia.
• Place the contact surface of the calipers at a 90-degree angle to the skinfold approximately 1 cm below the fingers. Slightly release the pressure between the fingers, but remain to hold the skinfold so that the caliper apply greater pressure. Release the caliper handle and read the needle to the nearest 0.1mm approximately 4 seconds after the pressure is released.
• Keep the fold elevated while the measurement is recorded
• Take at least three measurements at each site, and calculate the mean value for use in the equation. Retest if the second measurement is not within 1 mm of the first measurement.
• Skinfold measurements should not be taken when the skin is wet or after exercise.
• Find the percent body fat based on age, sex, and skinfold total below.
The following images and instructions will help you to locate the four sites used in the Durnin and Womersley test. Once you have successfully located the sites, use the previous instructions on how to take a skinfold to complete the four-site test. Locating the exact same measurement point with every follow-up measurement is crucial to the consistency of the results.
Tricep Skinfold
-Vertical fold
-Located on the posterior midline of the upper arm
-Measure halfway between the acromion (bony point of the shoulder) and olecranon processes (bony point of the elbow)
-Arm held freely to the side of the body
Subscapular Skinfold
-Diagonal fold
-Located 1 to 2 cm below the inferior angle of the scapula (the bottom of the shoulder blade)
-If you struggle to locate the bottom of the shoulder blade then ask your client to raise their arm up behind their back – this should make the scapula become more prominent.
Subscapular Skinfold
-Diagonal fold
-Located 1 to 2 cm below the inferior angle of the scapula (the bottom of the shoulder blade)
-If you struggle to locate the bottom of the shoulder blade then ask your client to raise their arm up behind their back – this should make the scapula become more prominent.
Suprailiac Skinfold
-Diagonal fold
-Located 1 cm above the anterior superior iliac crest (top of the hip bone)
-Locating this landmark may require you to ‘poke’ firmly through thick subcutaneous layers of fat to find the bone underneath.
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) are commonly used to assess body composition. Both techniques provide valuable information, but they differ in accuracy and the type of data they offer.
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) BIA measures body composition by sending a low-level electrical current through the body and measuring the resistance encountered. The resistance is then used to estimate the amount of body fat, lean body mass, and total body water. BIA devices are typically affordable and widely accessible, making them popular for personal trainers and fitness centers. However, BIA is less accurate than DEXA, as it can be affected by factors such as hydration levels, food intake, and recent physical activity.
Hydration status changes can significantly affect body tissue’s electrical conductivity, leading to variations in the results obtained from BIA (Lukaski, 1987). Despite its limitations, BIA can still be regarded as a helpful tool for estimating body composition, especially when ease of administration is a priority (Institute of Medicine 2012).
The more accurate devices are becoming expensive and offer many extra features.
Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) is considered the gold standard for body composition analysis, providing highly accurate fat mass, lean mass, and bone mineral density measurements. DEXA uses X-ray technology to scan the entire body and generate a detailed report on body composition. Although DEXA is more accurate than BIA, it is also more expensive. It requires specialized equipment, usually not available in fitness centers. Certain larger health clubs will provide these measurements, although we have yet to find such health clubs.
Both BIA and DEXA measurements can be influenced by the body’s water retention, which is connected to nutrition and physical activity before the assessments. Therefore, to ensure accurate and consistent results, it is crucial to perform these measurements separately from training sessions and under the same conditions (e.g., same day, same time, and consistent nutrition habits).